Skip to main content

This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1577

reference
352-tree-1
name
1577
tree-preservation-order

undefined

352-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.046265 50.893329)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.046166 50.893319,-1.046170 50.893338,-1.046184 50.893356,-1.046206 50.893370,-1.046233 50.893379,-1.046264 50.893382,-1.046295 50.893380,-1.046323 50.893371,-1.046345 50.893357,-1.046359 50.893340,-1.046365 50.893320,-1.046360 50.893301,-1.046347 50.893283,-1.046325 50.893269,-1.046297 50.893260,-1.046267 50.893257,-1.046236 50.893259,-1.046208 50.893268,-1.046185 50.893282,-1.046171 50.893299,-1.046166 50.893319)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL